Hi Glenn,
And since they have the palnes on the pedestals like that, you would think it would be a real non-issue.
The Air Force Academy has a B-52 in a similar configuration, but it is outside the gates to the school and that makes it easy enough, but I was in Boise about a month ago, and wanted a picture of the F-111 they had, and although in 1984 I was there and got the chance to sit in the right hand seat of the live bid and shoot some pictures from the ramp, I found that they had no fondness for individuals taking pictures anymore.
The Air Force Museum at Hill Air Force Base was the place to get pictures in the 90's, and may still be, but I have not been there in 8 years, so I do not know their status anymore.
Bukley ANG, and the left hand side of the field in Colorado Springs is about the same regarding restrictions, but I would not ever try and take any through the fences of the facility.
Every where I go, people admit that taking pictures of aircraft is a great American past time, and a time honored tradition, but since 9-11 and under the current political circumstances they admit that they are having to restrict aircraft photography.
There was also some comments at a recent meeting with several airport professionals regarding the digital photography age. Before digital is was more complicated to scan and transmit or post pictures on the internet, and we all used film cameras. But it is the information about ownership and aircraft movement around the country, has drawn concerns about "tracking". The fact is you can track just about any airplane via the internet, IF you were inclined to do so.
Me, I don't really care to follow aircraft movement, and most of the time I don't even inquire about registry numbers, because I just like to take my best pictures of the planes. Ownership, and movement just does not interst "me" as a part of the hobby.