GlennE.Chatfield The c/n for 56-0365 show 1055/1666. This should be corrected to just 1055. I did not notice this when I linked it to C-GDCJ and now both call-signs have two profiles. Can this be fixed? Glenn
GlennE.Chatfield The c/ns are fixed but the link between the two planes has disappeared. Can you redo the link?
Ken Wang http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/C-GDCJ.html This airframe should be deleted and relink C-GDCJ to 56-0365's airframe? Ken