1235 and 235 are the same aircraft, which went by these two designations while in service. These two should be linked but adding the name "Dragonfly" to 235 - everything else looks the same.
N4927E is the FAA registration carried for a while but linking this caused some extra profiles to be generated. Since the FAA link is a common problem, we can delink that and then just make a comment on the military profiles.
Glenn.
I have de-linked the profiles.
But I note that all 5 images in the two profiles, 235 & 1235, were taken at the same location and within a common period of time. Surely then all 5 images should appear in the same profile, unless the the exhibit was at some time repainted to a different identity, which appears not to be the case.
The museum lists the aircraft as
HO3S-1G Aircraft, Bureau Number 235.
joebaugher lists 1235 as a re-serial.
I suggest that the images are all contained in the 235 profile. Then either retain the 1235 profile with linkage to 235, or delete and add a relevant note to the 235 profile.
Malcolm.
Yeah, this came about because I tend to use latest designations when I ID my planes, so I profiled this as 1235. It was later when Daniel Compton and I discussed this bird that we learned we had each identified it differently, so I linked them - badly, obviously. Since two out of three of us did it as 235, I'll join the club and move mine
Which would work easiest - link 1235 to 235 or just delete the link and put a note on the profile for 235? I'd go with the easiest way.
Glenn