Glenn.
I have yet to action your request as I believe there to be a principle which needs some discussion.
I do not agree that a second profile of an airframe should be raised in order to display corrections to the data contained in the FAA documentation.
I find this may cause confusion and images are also divided between the two profiles.
It is already an established practice that the FAA profile leads and I believe that any corrections/deviations should be entered as comments in the FAA profile.
I have in fact already instigated this with a number of other registrations.
Is this something that can be agreed upon? (Ken, Walt, Chris?)
I would also take this opportunity to make further comment.
From the work I, along with my fellow admin staff, have been involved with within the database, there has been and maybe still is some misunderstanding of linkage.
Linkage is a means of connecting different registrations/profiles of the same airframe, i.e. one cn.
What I have found, with some frequency, are numerous "linkages" to aircraft of the same type. This has the effect of allocating the same cn to all of these airframes, only one of which is likely to be correct. Unfortunately, the only way to correct these, is to delete all but one and re-enter the remainder anew, not exactly much fun when as many as 10 different airframes have been connected in this way.
Included in Glenn's list are some six registrations for this airframe which are not currently in the database.
Should we add profiles for each of these?
Malcolm.